PancakeSwap AMM (V2) Factory · authority risk 2/100, critical

Can one person move the money in PancakeSwap AMM (V2) Factory on Robinhood Chain? The authority score is 2 / 100 (critical): one key or a tiny group.

In short. Pairs are immutable (no upgrade surface at all) - but feeToSetter is a bare, actively-used EOA (real nonce 20) that alone can redirect protocol fees or hand off control, with zero delay.

Exposure, not intent. The score counts what the keys could do, not what their holders will do, and says nothing about the odds of a loss. Re-read it yourself with a public RPC and curl: how.

Try a fix: drag the sliders Open the live dashboard re-read from the chain every 6 hours; this page is the snapshot of the build

The five readings

admin key5
multisig0
timelock0
price feed100
shared control80

Composite = 40% admin key + 30% multisig + 30% timelock, rounded. Price feed and shared control are read and shown, not folded in.

To move the money: keys and hours to react not read for this contract (never shown as zero).

Why this score

Pairs are immutable (no upgrade surface at all) - but feeToSetter is a bare, actively-used EOA (real nonce 20) that alone can redirect protocol fees or hand off control, with zero delay.

$1.9B TVL across all chains (DefiLlama)

The blast radius here is fee-routing control only, not a rug of pooled funds - but it is still a single, uncontested key over that entire surface, the same shape already tracked for Curve DEX on this chain.

1 of 6 requirements met

Exit window: none: a change applies at once, the time a user has to leave after a harmful change is queued.

If a market used the example policy today (src/ExampleConsumer.sol: revert when stale, 0 under 60, 50% to 80% above): collateral factor 0 (score 2 is under MIN_SAFE_SCORE 60). Cheapest path to weak (20): admin key from 5 to 49, that is a stronger admin setup (admin power spread beyond one key, or checked by others), every other axis unchanged. This is the smallest step into the next band, not a fix for the weakness: the first requirement not met is Admin power is not a bare key (one key, or a tiny group, can change it).

Show this score in your README
[![authority risk: PancakeSwap AMM (V2) Factory](https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https%3A%2F%2Fraw.githubusercontent.com%2FRealSpap%2Fauthority-risk-oracle-showcase%2Fwatch-data%2Fbadge%2Frobinhood-chain%2F0x02a84c1b3bbd7401a5f7fa98a384ebc70bb5749e.json)](https://realspap.github.io/oracle/p/robinhood-0x02a84c1b3bbd7401a5f7fa98a384ebc70bb5749e.html)

A live badge: the score is read from the published watch files every time the page that shows it loads. Change nothing but your own repository.

Not assessed for this contract: who holds the admin power: the independent reader could not classify the holder; how many keys it takes to move it; the time anyone has to react; the money behind one key (no money figure, or no key count).

Money behind it: $106k (DefiLlama), of which $104k sits exposed to this setup (TVL × (100 − score) / 100, a weight, not a prediction).

Contract: 0x02a84c1b3bbd7401a5f7fa98a384ebc70bb5749e on the explorer ↗. Score pushed on-chain on 2026-10-13; stale on the oracle when older than 9 days (the watch re-reads it anyway). Read the score yourself: getScore(0x02a84c1b3bbd7401a5f7fa98a384ebc70bb5749e) on the Robinhood Chain oracle, listed in the repository.

Read at block 136039274, methodology 0x667dc486af9557a8…. The score reads the authority path (keys, multisigs, timelocks, roles, price feeds); it does not audit the code for bugs, and it measures exposure, not the chance of being hit (see the backtest in the repository). Dispute this score with evidence, or read this page as JSON.

Independent read of the admin: not possible here (no admin slot, owner(), admin(), DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE member or authority() answered). (scripts/second_opinion.py: a reader that shares nothing with the scorer, re-run every 6 hours)

Score unchanged since its publication on 2026-10-13; every later move will be a line of the hash-chained log. Methodology changed on 2026-10-13: points before that date come from another method and are not comparable.

Follow this contract: Atom feed of its score moves, alerts and queued operations (nothing else).

Reproduce this read yourself (latest block: this RPC cannot replay the block of the build, public RPC, no key)
curl -s -X POST https://rpc.testnet.chain.robinhood.com/rpc -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"eth_call","params":[{"to":"0x9BF45734D09bC7CA39238e767B2af9AAc62a7f52","data":"0xd47875d000000000000000000000000002a84c1b3bbd7401a5f7fa98a384ebc70bb5749e"},"latest"]}'

The 6th 32-byte word of the answer is the composite score (2 = 0x2); the 7th is the push timestamp. This RPC cannot replay the block of the build (it ignores the block tag, or no longer serves old state), so the value is the current one: compare the composite and the push timestamp with this page.