Can one person move the money in Gauntlet USDC Prime (gtUSDCp) on Base? The authority score is 66 / 100 (decent): a multisig and a delay, with gaps.
Exposure, not intent. The score counts what the keys could do, not what their holders will do, and says nothing about the odds of a loss. Re-read it yourself with a public RPC and curl: how.
Try a fix: drag the sliders Open the live dashboard re-read from the chain every 6 hours; this page is the snapshot of the build
| admin key | 60 |
|---|---|
| multisig | 65 |
| timelock | 75 |
| price feed | 52 |
| shared control | 100 |
Composite = 40% admin key + 30% multisig + 30% timelock, rounded. Price feed and shared control are read and shown, not folded in.
To move the money: 4 keys, 168 h to react, about $103M behind one key.
Exit window: a confirmed delay, bypass paths checked, the time a user has to leave after a harmful change is queued.
If a market used the example policy today (src/ExampleConsumer.sol: revert when stale, 0 under 60, 50% to 80% above): collateral factor 54.50% (score 66). Cheapest path to strong (80): admin key from 60 to 94, that is a stronger admin setup (admin power spread beyond one key, or checked by others), every other axis unchanged. This is the smallest step into the next band, not a fix for the weakness: the first requirement not met is Price feed not under one hand (one party controls the price).
[](https://realspap.github.io/oracle/p/base-0xee8f4ec5672f09119b96ab6fb59c27e1b7e44b61.html)
A live badge: the score is read from the published watch files every time the page that shows it loads. Change nothing but your own repository.
Not assessed for this contract: shared control: the score says no key is shared, but this contract's own independent read lists another tracked contract with the same admin (unresolved, 12/10: do not read "no key shared" as established).
Money behind it: $413M (DefiLlama), of which $140M sits exposed to this setup (TVL × (100 − score) / 100, a weight, not a prediction).
Contract: 0xee8f4ec5672f09119b96ab6fb59c27e1b7e44b61 on the explorer ↗. Score pushed on-chain on 2026-10-12; stale on the oracle when older than 9 days (the watch re-reads it anyway). Read the score yourself: getScore(0xee8f4ec5672f09119b96ab6fb59c27e1b7e44b61) on the Base oracle, listed in the repository.
Read at block 48160953, methodology 0x0ffe08e65a4a36a2…. The score reads the authority path (keys, multisigs, timelocks, roles, price feeds); it does not audit the code for bugs, and it measures exposure, not the chance of being hit (see the backtest in the repository). Dispute this score with evidence, or read this page as JSON.
Other hands: guardian() is a Safe 3-of-7 (0x7084bf4db6c21e1834dd6482f6056a39a33584cd); curator() is a Safe 3-of-7 (0x9e33faae38ff641094fa68c65c2ce600b3410585). A role is named by its getter, what it can do depends on the protocol (in a MetaMorpho vault guardian() can revoke a pending change, it does not move funds). A change is an alert.
Admin Safe activity: the Safe 0x5a4e…d4d0 has executed 157 transactions (this watch has read that number since 2026-10-10; it has not seen it move). A Safe idle for 14 days or more that executes again, with money behind it, is an alert.
Read live: admin: Safe 4-of-6 of 6 plain keys; delay: 168 h the contract enforces itself.
Independent read of the admin: a Safe 4-of-6 0x5a4e1984…d4d0 via owner(), consistent with the published admin-key score. Unchanged since 2026-10-10. The attacker's question: 4 keys move this contract, 168 h to react, $103M behind each key ($413M of USDC held by this contract, totalAssets() read live). The contract enforces its own timelock of 168 h (timelock()). 4 keys collude to act; 3 keys lost and nobody can act. Signers: 6 plain keys. This holder also governs 1 other tracked contract (about $272k behind all of them, DefiLlama): 0xc609656e… on Tempo. (scripts/second_opinion.py: a reader that shares nothing with the scorer, re-run every 6 hours)
Score unchanged since its publication on 2026-10-12; every later move will be a line of the hash-chained log. Methodology changed on 2026-10-13: points before that date come from another method and are not comparable.
# owner() on the contract: the holder
curl -s -X POST https://mainnet.base.org -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"eth_call","params":[{"to":"0xee8f4ec5672f09119b96ab6fb59c27e1b7e44b61","data":"0x8da5cb5b"},"0x32362db"]}'
# getThreshold() on the holder (a Safe)
curl -s -X POST https://mainnet.base.org -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"eth_call","params":[{"to":"0x5a4e19842e09000a582c20a4f524c26fb48dd4d0","data":"0xe75235b8"},"latest"]}'
# getOwners() on the holder: the signer set (word 2 is the count)
curl -s -X POST https://mainnet.base.org -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"eth_call","params":[{"to":"0x5a4e19842e09000a582c20a4f524c26fb48dd4d0","data":"0xa0e67e2b"},"latest"]}'
# getModulesPaginated(0x1, 50) on the holder: the modules (a module executes without the signatures)
curl -s -X POST https://mainnet.base.org -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"eth_call","params":[{"to":"0x5a4e19842e09000a582c20a4f524c26fb48dd4d0","data":"0xcc2f845200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000032"},"latest"]}'
# the guard slot of the holder (keccak of guard_manager.guard.address)
curl -s -X POST https://mainnet.base.org -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"eth_getStorageAt","params":["0x5a4e19842e09000a582c20a4f524c26fb48dd4d0","0x4a204f620c8c5ccdca3fd54d003badd85ba500436a431f0cbda4f558c93c34c8","latest"]}'Each answer is a 32-byte word (an address sits in its last 20 bytes); the admin path is the one scripts/second_opinion.py reports for this contract. read between blocks 52650708 and 52650715 of the chain
Follow this contract: Atom feed of its score moves, alerts and queued operations (nothing else).
curl -s -X POST https://sepolia.base.org -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"eth_call","params":[{"to":"0x50840a7667baEa9D05ad4ae3dCeb384724b58720","data":"0xd47875d0000000000000000000000000ee8f4ec5672f09119b96ab6fb59c27e1b7e44b61"},"0x2dee0b9"]}'The 6th 32-byte word of the answer is the composite score (66 = 0x42); the 7th is the push timestamp. Same call with "latest" instead of the block gives the current value.